Grand Forks Church of Christ
Forum
                                                                      
                       

                                            The Silence Of The Bible


                                                                                 H. Leo Boles




   There has been a great deal of discussion on "The Silence of the Bible." Some have emphasized the respect we
should have for the authority of God by respecting the silence of the Bible. Others have taught that where the Bible
is silent, we have a right to speak. The issue is, "Does God give to man the right to teach and practice in the name
of Christ anything about which there is no divine revelation?" Has God given sufficient guidance in all affairs that
pertain to the work and worship of the Lord? Has He left some things to the wisdom and judgment of man? How shall
we know what has been left to the judgment of man in the work and worship of the Lord?

If, by His silence in revelation, God has granted to man the right to teach and practice some things, then there
opens a field of strife and division. Man cannot agree with his fellows as to what must be brought in, and no greater
source of division can be found than the different standards of men.

The Bible clearly teaches that man should not add to the word of God. "Ye shall not add unto the word which I
command you, neither shall ye diminish from it, that ye may keep the commandments of Jehovah your
God which I command you." (Deut. 4:2). Here we learn that Jehovah would not let the children of Israel add to
nor take from anything He had commanded them. Jehovah had given the law, and it was sufficient to guide them in
all of their work and worship. They were to let the law stand, without additions, subtractions, or alterations. This
enforced upon them to respect God's silence on any subject. If they could not add to or take from the law, they were
not to impose human judgments upon the people. To do so would be to add to or take from the law. They had to
respect the silence of Jehovah on the work and worship they were to perform.

The New Testament teaches the same principle: "I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto them, God shall add unto him the plagues which are
written in this book: and if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God
shall take away his part from the tree of life, and out of the holy city, which are written in this book."
(Rev. 22:18-19). This demands that man respect the silence of divine revelation. No one is permitted to add to or
take from the teachings of the New Testament. It will not do to say that the above quotation applies only to the book
of Revelation. God would not forbid one from adding to or subtracting from only one book in the New Testament, but
would also grant man the privilege of adding to and taking from other books.

This principle applies to all the books of the New Testament. Other teachings show this to be true. "Now these
things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and Apollos for your sakes; that in us ye might
learn not to go beyond the things which are written..." (1 Cor. 4:6). These Corinthians were thus forbidden to
go beyond the things that were written. They were to respect the silence of God — the silence of the Scriptures —
and not make any alterations. God would not forbid the church at Corinth to "go beyond the things which are
written," and at the same time grant other churches to add what they pleased or to leave off anything they did not
wish to teach or practice. What He says here to the church at Corinth is applied to all of the churches, and is
applicable to His people through all ages.

The same truth is expressed by John: "Whosoever goeth onward and abideth not in the teaching of Christ,
hath not God: he that abideth in the teaching, the same hath both the Father and the Son. If any one
cometh unto you, and bringeth not this teaching, receive him not into your house, and give him no
greeting: for he that giveth him greeting partaketh in his evil works." (2 Jn. 9-11). This teaches that the
silence of "the teachings of Christ" must be respected. John is writing to no particular church, but Christians in
general. Hence, the principle of respecting the silence of "the teachings of Christ" is here taught by John.

One is safe when one follows the teachings of God. One impeaches the wisdom of God when one attempts to make
any alterations in "what is written" in the New Testament. In doing so, one must take the attitude that either God did
not know enough to give man a complete guide for all ages, or that God has left man free to make additions where
God has not spoken.

The foundation of the argument that man may speak where the Bible is silent rests, like Dagon's temple, upon two
pillars, which, so long as they continue sound, will support all the theories of men. The first pillar is that "the church
of Christ, like all other societies, has power to make laws for its government." The second pillar is that, "where the
sacred Scriptures are silent, human authority may interpose." But if some Samson can be found to shake these
pillars from their bases, the whole edifice, with the lords of the Philistines in their seats and the multitude with which it
is crowded, will be involved in one common ruin. If the two principles mentioned above are granted, the arguments
cannot be refuted. But if it can be shown that the principles are false, the conclusions, with all the arguments based
on them, are false.

First, the church of Christ is not like other societies. It is different from all human institutions, because Christ framed
a constitution for it which is different from any of the teachings of man. No one can show that God permits man to
speak or act in the name of Christ where the New Testament is silent. There is not a single sentence in all the New
Testament that warrants man to speak, where the New Testament is silent, in the name of Christ; there is no
Scripture that grants man such authority. How, then, can man know that he has the right to speak where the Bible is
silent? No human association, no individual has any right to interpose authority where the New Testament neither
enjoins nor forbids. We must respect the authority of God here.

To interpose and draft regulations where the New Testament is silent is to legislate for God's people where God has
not legislated. It is a fearful thing to impose anything in the name of Christ upon God's people when God has not
spoken on that point. If He has spoken, then we must respect what He has said. If He has not spoken, then we must
respect His wisdom in remaining silent.

It seems that anyone would know that the floodgate would be open and all sorts of innovations would be brought
into the work and worship of the Lord's people if we do not respect the silence of the Bible. To respect the silence of
the Bible is to respect God. To break that silence is to impeach the wisdom, love, and authority of God. It is to
commit the high crime of presumptuous sin. "Every scripture inspired of God is also profitable for teaching,
for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness: that the man of God may be
complete, furnished completely unto every good work." (2 Tim. 3:16- 17).